Here he appears to be thinner than on the original. To be certain about the authenticity, inspect the Jumpman logo, his size and body proportions. However, this replica is one of the poorer quality models, and most of the better quality fakes actually get the colors right. The most obvious flaw of this replica is the incorrect colors. In the original it is thicker and made of more dense material, while in the replica it looks cheaply made. On the authentic it is thinner, more delicate, and placed further from the edge of the tag.įinally, notice the white frame around the size tag. This is due to replicas having poorer quality of printing. The text of the fake tag is obviously thicker, which is especially noticeable on the bottom text. Not only that, but the fake has a line in the crotch area that is not needed.Īs for the size tag, we recommend you to focus on the font, as it can instantly give away cheap manufacturing. Notice how his arms look like tubes, and the head is too big. Due to excessive stitching, the Jumpman silhouette appears to be too thick. The stitching of the logo should be dense, but not bumpy, and this is where the replica gets it wrong. The authentic has a slightly lighter shade of blue, also called University Blue. The stitching is also smaller than needed.Ĭoming up next, let’s discuss the Jumpman logo placed on the throat of the shoe.įirst of all, the logo on the throat is the wrong color. The fake tag is slightly smaller, and the letters are thinner. Next, check the black and white Jordan tag. The fake one looks too smooth, and may also have an unpleasant factory smell, which the real pair of course should not have. It is very textured and you can see individual lines, which signifies that the sneakers are made from real, excellent leather. On the fake VS real Jordan 13 Flint comparison below you can notice how the authentic shoe is made of higher quality leather, judging by the leather texture. The next method of Jordan 13 Flint authentication that we are going to cover today is the toebox method. Not only that, but the “23” is done in a different font, as the letters are slightly thinner. The design on the fake hologram is off-centered so much that the full silhouette of the Jumpman logo and the “23” numbers cannot be fully seen. The stitching of the Jordan 13 Flint replica here is clearly done poorly, some stitches are uneven and look roughly done. What you should really pay attention to is the stitching and the design of the hologram. You can notice that the colors differ, but fear not, because the color of the hologram actually changes depending on the lighting. Not only that, but the stitching of the fake is bigger and looks more obvious.įor our second method, let’s look at the Jumpman hologram placed on the ankle. The texture of the gray suede should feel very smooth, because the authentic model uses higher quality materials. The blue fabric, intertwined with reflective 3M detailing, should have a more dimpled look. We also advise you to be wary of any loose threads sticking out, as they definitely raise suspicion about the authenticity of the pair.įinally, pay attention to the textures. The toe box, on the other hand, is not curved enough.Īnother detail that the Jordan 13 Flint replica got wrong is the white pods on the midsole, which are incorrectly shaped. The heel of the authentic shoe has a straight line shape, while the fake one is more curved. The shape of the shoe is also incorrect, and it becomes more obvious when looking at the heel and the toe box areas. Right off the bat you can notice a flaw in coloring, although the colors may appear different under various lighting. For starters, we suggest you pay your attention to the overall shape of the shoe.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |